Hiroshima was chosen as the primary target since it had remained largely untouched by bombing raids, and the bomb’s effects could be clearly measured.
Why was Nagasaki and Hiroshima chosen?
However, Nagasaki was originally chosen as the third target for atomic bombing because its population was much smaller than those of Hiroshima and Kokura, which was the second target.
Why did the US drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and not Tokyo?
U.S. strategists wanted to flatten an entire city with a single atomic bomb: Hiroshima was the right size. The name Hiroshima is so tied to the atomic bomb that it’s hard to imagine there were other possible targets.
Why did the United States drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 quizlet?
The bombing took place after the United States had issued the Potsdam Declaration, an ultimatum to Japan on July 26th that threatened prompt and utter destruction if the Japanese did not surrender. Emperor Hirohito of Japan ignored the ultimatum, which led to the decision to drop the atomic bombs.
Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan essay?
The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered.
Why was Hiroshima chosen as the bombing site quizlet?
Why was Hiroshima chosen as the bombing site? Hiroshima was chosen as a target because of its military importance. Nagasaki was bombed a few days later.
What was the official reason for dropping atomic bombs on Japan quizlet?
Truman’s decision to order the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was based largely on the desire to end the war quickly with the fewest number of casualties possible.
How did the American government justify dropping the atomic bomb on Japan quizlet?
The US dropped the bomb because Truman knew it would destroy an entire city and it would save American lives because they would not have to go fight to take over the city. The Japanese had shown their firm resolve to not surrender so this was a last attempt to force their hand.
Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
“Yes.
A bloody invasion and round-the-clock conventional bombing would have led to a far higher death toll and so the atomic weapons actually saved thousands of American and millions of Japanese lives. The bombs were the best means to bring about unconditional surrender, which is what the US leaders wanted.
Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?
When compared against a land invasion of Japan, the atomic bombings absolutely make ethical sense. On one side, two destroyed cities and about 200,000 killed. On the other, a fight to the finish against a suicidal opponent that could leave millions dead.
What were the reasons the bomb should have been used in Japan?
There have been several key reasons developed to support this position, such as:
- It led to a quick end to World War II.
- It saved the lives of American soldiers.
- It potentially saved the lives of Japanese soldiers and civilians.
- It forced Japan to surrender, which it appeared unwilling to do.
Why did the US target Hiroshima and Nagasaki quizlet?
Hiroshima was chosen as the first target due to its military and industrial values. As a military target, Hiroshima was a major army base that housed the headquarters of the Japanese 5th Division and the 2nd Army Headquarters. It was also an important port in southern Japan and a communications center.
Why did the US use the atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki quizlet?
The U.S decided to drop the two bombs on Japan because Japan refused to surrender, causing the Pacific War to drag on. The U.S offered a unconditional surrender known as the ‘Potsdam Declaration’ and said if they didn’t agree to it, they would face the Alternative of “Prompt and utter destruction” and Japan ignored it.
Why shouldn’t we drop the atomic bomb on Japan?
Japan could no longer defend itself from the relentless US air onslaught; ferocious firebombing had reduced most Japanese cities, including Tokyo, to ash. General Curtis LeMay, commander of strategic bombing, even complained that there was nothing left to bomb but “garbage can targets.”
Was Tokyo supposed to be nuked?
B-29 raids from those islands began on 17 November 1944, and lasted until 15 August 1945, the day of Japanese surrender. Over 50% of Tokyo’s industry was spread out among residential and commercial neighborhoods; firebombing cut the whole city’s output in half.
Bombing of Tokyo.
| Date | 1942, 1944–1945 |
|---|---|
| Result | American victory |
Why shouldn’t we drop the atomic bomb on Japan?
Japan could no longer defend itself from the relentless US air onslaught; ferocious firebombing had reduced most Japanese cities, including Tokyo, to ash. General Curtis LeMay, commander of strategic bombing, even complained that there was nothing left to bomb but “garbage can targets.”
Was the USA justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
“Yes.
A bloody invasion and round-the-clock conventional bombing would have led to a far higher death toll and so the atomic weapons actually saved thousands of American and millions of Japanese lives. The bombs were the best means to bring about unconditional surrender, which is what the US leaders wanted.
Why did the US not bomb Kyoto?
U.S. Secretary of War Henry Stimson wanted Kyoto removed from the target list, on the grounds that the city was too culturally significant to the Japanese to be destroyed.
Do Hiroshima and Nagasaki still exist?
The radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today is on a par with the extremely low levels of background radiation (natural radioactivity) present anywhere on Earth. It has no effect on human bodies.
Are Nagasaki and Hiroshima still radioactive?
Today, the background radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is the same as the average amount of natural radiation present anywhere on Earth.
Similar Posts:
- Why didn’t the US choose to demolish Tokyo with an atom bomb?
- Did the leaflets from the US to Hiroshima/Nagasaki civilians on bombing cities reduce the civilian casualties of the two nuclear bombs in August 1945?
- Did the US really consider demonstrating the atomic bomb to the Japanese by “blowing the top” off of Mt. Fuji?
- Was the death toll in the atomic bombing of Japanese territory greater than was expected by the US?
- What was the extent of Japanese control after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs and before surrender?
- Did the Japenese consider the atomic bomb no worse than any other bomb?
- Plans for More Nuclear Warfare in Japan during WW2